Traduction de «être sous l'influence » (Français → Anglais) :

be under the influence of [ be affected by ]

be spaced-out

centrally-driven policies

Definition: Any other disorders of sensation, function and behaviour, not due to physical disorders, which are not mediated through the autonomic nervous system, which are limited to specific systems or parts of the body, and which are closely associated in time with stressful events or problems. | Psychogenic:dysmenorrhoea | dysphagia, including globus hystericus | pruritus | torticollis | Teeth-grinding

under heat exposure

entity subject to significant influence [ associated undertaking | significantly-influenced entity ]

affect adversely | impair

company subject to significant influence | significantly influenced company | associate | associate company | associated company | associated undertaking

Definition: A disorder characterized by the development either of a single delusion or of a set of related delusions that are usually persistent and sometimes lifelong. The content of the delusion or delusions is very variable. Clear and persistent auditory hallucinations (voices), schizophrenic symptoms such as delusions of control and marked blunting of affect, and definite evidence of brain disease are all incompatible with this diagnosis. However, the presence of occasional or transitory auditory hallucinations, particularly in elderly patients, does not rule out this diagnosis, provided that they are not typically schizophrenic and ...[+++]form only a small part of the overall clinical picture. | Paranoia Paranoid:psychosis | state | Paraphrenia (late) Sensitiver Beziehungswahn

Definition: The schizophrenic disorders are characterized in general by fundamental and characteristic distortions of thinking and perception, and affects that are inappropriate or blunted. Clear consciousness and intellectual capacity are usually maintained although certain cognitive deficits may evolve in the course of time. The most important psychopathological phenomena include thought echo; thought insertion or withdrawal; thought broadcasting; delusional perception and delusions of control; influence or passivity; hallucina ...[+++]tory voices commenting or discussing the patient in the third person; thought disorders and negative symptoms. The course of schizophrenic disorders can be either continuous, or episodic with progressive or stable deficit, or there can be one or more episodes with complete or incomplete remission. The diagnosis of schizophrenia should not be made in the presence of extensive depressive or manic symptoms unless it is clear that schizophrenic symptoms antedate the affective disturbance. Nor should schizophrenia be diagnosed in the presence of overt brain disease or during states of drug intoxication or withdrawal. Similar disorders developing in the presence of epilepsy or other brain disease should be classified under F06.2, and those induced by psychoactive substances under F10-F19 with common fourth character .5.

If the answer to the third question is in the affirmative, when determining the extent of that influence and those directions, what circumstances can be taken into account, or, more specifically, on the basis of what criteria may it be found that a decisive influence is exercised over the supply of the service and that the real financial content of the underlying transaction was for the benefit of the undertaking which grants the licence?

In the circumstances of the main proceedings and in the light of the considerations set out in the second question, in order to identify the person supplying the service for the purposes of VAT is it relevant, in addition to the analysis of the underlying contractual transaction, that the creator of the know-how, as a natural person, exercises influence, or decisive influence, or issues directions regarding the way the service based on that know-how is supplied?

In my experience—God forbid I need any more experience in this—I've never seen anybody beat their wife on marijuana, I've never seen a bar fight through marijuana, but what it does to the brain is kind of what alcohol does.

Witness(es):From the Canadian Society for Forensic Science: Wayne Jeffery, Chair, Drugs and Driving Committee, Vancouver Forensic Laboratory; Joel Mayer, Member and Toxicologist, Drugs and Driving Committee; From the Department of Justice: Donald K. Piragoff, General Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section; Hal Pruden, Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section.